How to make proposals to the Community Funding DAO


The AGP-10 Community Funding DAO is now live!

You can see the DAO, submit proposals, and vote with your ANT here:

(Original AGP discussion here.)

The proposal process is intentionally lightweight compared to AGP-1 and no hard requirements are defined in AGP-10, but here’s a process I suggest proposal authors follow:

  • Create a new thread here in the Community section of the forum titled “Funding proposal: lorem ipsum yadda yadda”.

  • Add the tag funding-dao to the post.

  • Put the content of your proposal in the first post on the thread. What you plan to do with the funds, what the specific deliverables are, when you plan to deliver them, etc. Discourse keeps a changelog of edits, but even so if you make changes to your proposal make a note of where and when changes are made for transparency’s sake, so ANT holders can follow along with the evolution of the proposal.

  • Give people a couple of weeks to discuss the proposal. If comments are generally supportive, then you can create a transfer from the Finance app of the DAO paying yourself to complete the deliverables in the proposal. Put a link to your proposal’s forum thread in the reference field of the transfer so people know what the transfer is for.

  • Bonus: start doing work on the proposal deliverables before you make the Finance transfer, and share your progress in your proposal thread so ANT holders can tell you are serious. You’re probably more likely to have the proposal approved than if you haven’t contributed anything yet.

Feedback? Questions? Hit the reply button, let’s talk about it.


Funding Proposal: Daolist
Bounty proposal for a self service product analytics platform
Funding proposal: Platform Cooperativism Consortium

This is good, I like it.



Hi all/@anteater,

As stated previously, this is a great proposal.

I have a question re perceived scope of the fund…

The Aragon Cooperative Autonomous Organisation generated an initial flurry of widespread awareness and activity but now requires some focused attention. I’ve suggested among our participants (& in other threads) applying to CFDAO to employ someone for 3 months, 2 days p.w. to production manage the project*. Rough plan would be to extend again for another 3 month term if deemed successful, then ideally expand & apply to become Nest, then Flock in 18 months or so.

I guess the 1st question is: Is this request for 7200DAI CF appropriate ?

Worth clearly stating - the role is to facilitate process & progress within the Cooperative. I envisage 1 day admin, 1 day research/outputs, keeping things moving along (which they currently aren’t), help organise members to making a start on the constitution, polling votes, and defining the bounds of the organisation.

The Aragon Coop’s value potential is actually vast – let’s make the most of what we (so nearly) have.

*full disclosure - I would be applying for the initial position



great Julian! I was thinking about less money than that, but yeah! why not 7.200.

As I have just stated in the Aragon Coop DAO - A Minimun Viable Manifesto (MVM), the funds should be moved to the Aragon Coop DAO, and then decide it allocation from there.

Let me know if you want me to help you out in making this funding proposal.

Thanks a lot! :slight_smile:



Hey Gustavo,

As mentioned in my follow-up post in the ‘MVM’ thread - transferring funds to the Coop and then deciding on allocation is, for me, not in the spirit of the CFDAO. We can propose a consensus vote on who should take this role and it’s initial scope but first it requires some community signalling from the forum that our approach is supported (or not:) IMO.



I would have a hard time supporting a proposal for 7200 DAI from the CFDAO as that is over half of its quarterly budget at the moment. Perhaps breaking it into 6-week chunks might be a better starting point?

Also I agree with @sepu85 that I don’t think there is any problem with proposing the funds go to the Coop and then are used to compensate coop contributions. AFAIK there are not really any strict restrictions on what sort of proposals are allowed in the CFDAO so pretty much anything is fair game.



Kk, fair enough (I did say 2 days p.w. for 3 months in the initial post:)

My reading of the proposal for not just asking for some cash…

But ok :slight_smile: happy to go with what works best… as one of my mentors is often heard to say, “let’s build it and see what it does.”



Right, anything that can get the support of ANT holders is eligible. Without commenting on the specific idea being proposed here (that discussion is better suited for its own thread) I would also not support a proposal that took up ~half of the DAO’s quarterly budget unless there was an out-sized ROI potential.

1 Like


Reimbursement request for consideration :mailbox_with_mail:: Funding proposal: Reimburse formation of Open, ESQ LLC (Hybrid Aragon Organization)



Is there a process similar to this on the forum for projects that may cost too much to fit within the 12,500 DAI budget for the CFDAO? Is it worth creating a #nest tag for projects that are seeking community feedback before formally applying to Nest? Thanks!

1 Like


@pcowgill just saw this, sorry for the delay. Nest is the closest thing, and there isn’t a tag for that but you are welcome to start one. If you have questions about the Nest process at all including when is the best time to create an issue in the Nest repo @LouisGrx can help with this.



Hey @pcowgill,
Sorry for the delay indeed!
You can very well create a forum thread asking for feedback from the community. However, note that Nest grants are distributed at the discretion of the Aragon Association (and not voted by the community). So another option is to directly submit your proposal in the issue tab of the Nest repository. That’s where the AA will review it and provide you feedback to move forward or close it. Hope I answered some of your questions

1 Like


I went ahead and created votes to upgrade the voting, vault, and finance apps in the community funding DAO for the 0.7 release. I figured I would post here so if anyone watching the org notices the votes they will have context.

1 Like