I think this is a pretty clear proposal that continues the good work this team has done. Some things I would make special note of as further context in support of the proposal:
This squad self organised and was the first group in operations to start coordinating across the different bounties
They are smart. As just one example their plan on rotating moderators creates a resilience in the squad… few DAOs/Guilds are doing this
The team has delivered some great results. Our telegram was a noisy mess of people shilling and ANT price conversations. This team have curated it into an informative and open discussion on tech, governance and Aragon news
The team has always tried to coordinate with core team members and make itself available to support others. Even within this proposal you can see the balance between their objectives and a desire to be ready to support core teams when key messaging is ready
I think with ESD’s guidance around metrics/deliverables this is the right team to take next steps on social media and connection with our audiences.
Hi Renee, thanks for sharing the youtube link. I attended the launch AMA but I don’t believe many others on the Growth team did, so I will share with them as there is a lot we can work with in promoting the Aragon App and educating our followers.
Hey, thanks for a great funding request!
The team has done great in S0 thorough the bounties and looking forward to the continued contributions.
Since @lee0007 has more domain expertise than myself and already dove in the detailed questions (already resulting in a more focused funding request) what’s left for me is to give my support for the funding request
This is a great proposal. I’d encourage you to apply to the Main DAO as relying on the ESD for ongoing funding of teams is not what the ESD was designed or is set up to do effectively. We have been too lenient in this respect in the past and the consequences of centralisation and overwork in some ESD members are showing. So please don’t take this personally. All the contrary, I think this is a worthwhile initative.
Happy to provide guidance on the necessary steps to get this submitted for the community’s approval.
These limitations were decided by the ESD in the previous season and included in the documentation that was open to significant discussion prior to posting in the forum and voting. It would seem unfair to change the standard only after people have committed time and energy to develop ESD proposals given that we have the budget to support these community efforts. This proposal falls within the current limitations, and we look forward to supporting Main DAO proposals in the future.
Hi ESD team, @lee0007@daniel-ospina@fartunov , thank you so much for your support in approving this proposal. A special thank you to @lee0007 for your help and advice getting the proposal ready to be submitted. We look forward to the task ahead and are excited to share our achievements with the community. @daniel-ospina , thanks for your message and recommendations regarding applying to the Main DAO, I hope to work with you towards the end of S1 to get our next proposal ready to submit to the Main DAO.
Great work growth team! Excited to see this team evolve the strategic alignment with AA and have new team members join. I understand the reporting on quantitative deliverables and routine.
Can you report please the status of the following Impact deliverables as I can not identify these in the report
Efficient Team: Establish a monthly posting calendar by the 1st of each month to guide routine activity
Team Development: Monthly rotation of social moderators
Can you link surveys (2) and to a few (3) different examples of how these are shared/promoted.
Well constructed surveys can deliver significant insight. I wonder if engagement may improve by reducing the frequency of new surveys and extending the timeline to promote and capture responses (one per month)
And while I recognise the proposal for surveys was intented to “better connect with potential developers” is this the right approach for DAO devs? How do we know if we are reaching the target audience?
Given clear need for growth and performance insight across multiple guilds can i ask growth to coordinate with the data insights crew cc @Fabs to in the develoment of surveys/questions that support their data collection needs
Please see attached our task board for May. We have our monthly planning meeting next week and will assign everyone at least one new task/channel to learn - Growth Team Task Board - Google Sheets
Here are the links to the 2 surveys completed to date (the first one you had already commented)
Both were sent out as part of the newsletter, as well as being posted separately on Twitter, Reddit and Telegram. One issue may have been that these have often been posted along with a number of other posts (reducing visibility), and not frequently enough. Posting them for longer time periods as you suggested could help, as will data insights so we can measure what is working and what’s not, which has been lacking to date.
I agree with a clear need for performance insights and @fabs and I have already been discussing how to start getting access to data. Our first step will be getting the newsletter posted on the Aragon website, we can send the links out on media channels and on discord as we have been doing, but will give us viewing data. I am also meeting with Jessica from AA Comms tomorrow to plan closer alignment between Growth and Comms as they prepare to join the DAO. She has been working on Communications Strategy, which should give some additional guidance in reaching our target audience.
Thank you for your message. We have just started to build out processes and procedures for each growth channel and deliverable, and I have added your suggestion to remove deleted accounts monthly.
The 2 audiences we had intended to communicate with for questionnaires were DAO builders and our community and social media followers in general. Unfortunately, while the first few surveys that were made had one of these 2 target groups in mind, no process was followed, thus the results were sub-par and we only published 2, including the language survey, and the number of respondents was not statistically relevant. We have since developed a process to follow and we expect to have some better refined surveys out this month. Here is the link to the notion page we have for surveys - Notion – The all-in-one workspace for your notes, tasks, wikis, and databases.