Financial Proposal: Increase monthly allocation for the Executive Sub DAO members

[lee0007]

Thanks Alex! @fartunov said he will post thursday

[fartunov]

For transparency, in light of the Coordinape circle slashing for AA team members I am revoking this statement and will be accepting the ESD fixed pay if the vote passes

@fartunov

I would request any voted base payment be transferred directly to unchain.fund for as long as I receive my salary from the AA.

[fartunov]

Indeed I will

[fartunov]

The technical issue is resolved. The proposal is going online in 5 min:
Aragon Voice

[lee0007]

I see the vote does not include the performance requirement as I did not update the proposal.

For transparency during the vote are we agreed that

1. under performance will impact the final payment each month and
2. individual responsibility to report against KPIs?

@lee0007

Rather than coordinape, my suggestion has always been that we have a fixed reward reduced based on performance against deliverables, with no extra reward paid for anything less than 80% across all deliverables

KPI’s	Reward
100%	2500
90%	1500
80%	500

CC @fartunov @daniel-ospina

@lee0007 FOR performance-based reward

[fartunov]

Hey, yes indeed. As we discussed on one of the ESD AMAs the first message constitutes the proposal, the rest is discussion. As the update/change was not reflected I did not take the liberty to include it into the vote

[alibama]

doesn’t seem like my kinda basic questions were worth answering directly… idk = whatevs?

[lee0007]

@fartunov

yes indeed

Yes not in vote
Yes was left out that’s why it’s not included
Yes agreed to performace based funding and individual monthly reporting

Can I get a simple for or against please. Just to be super clear

[lee0007]

ESD End of Month individual reporting to improve transparency as requested by community members on this forum

S1 ESD Transparency: Performance Reporting

At the outset of S1 the ESD provided a statement with performance KPI’s that we reported fortnightly in Discord as a group June 7 17 May 4 May 20 April. With the proposal to increase ESD monthly allocation (whether approved or not) we understand the community want more transparency around the individual contribution of each ESD member. This post is a response to your requests for more transparency. Rather than collective fortnightly reporting, we will each report end of the month on activity ag…

cc @alibama @Anthony.Leuts @fartunov @daniel-ospina

[fartunov]

I agree with all 3. Let’s discuss on the call today if the KPIs remain as stated or should be adjusted (they were defined as group performance)

[Incandenza]

I fully support this proposal, the effort that ESD has put on a huge number of proposals is cristal clear and that should be equally compensated, retroactively.
I also agree with the suggestion of @alibama of including @Shawncubbedge and @SpectraCryptoVerse into the ESD

[daniel-ospina]

Agreed on all 3. As discussed in the call we just had, this reporting is tripling the admin work but is 1) probably a necessary step until we can define better mechanisms and 2) shows our willingness to provide transparency to the community.

[AlexClay]

Vote Passed: Aragon Voice

@Ricktik6 please take this in to account for this month