ESD has already outlined a process for reporting requesting reporting by the 1st of the following month. However, this process was developed on the basis that S1 proposals would be posted and decided early in the month of April.
It will now be at least the 18th before the first funding proposals decisions are finalised and requesting reporting 12 days into a month fails to serve a purpose. It already appears that fixed dates lack the flexibility we need.
Should we consider changing the reporting so that it falls due 28 days following approval of funding? As this would better align reporting with the ESD General Meeting cadence? I would still however expect we retain the fixed payments date as the 15th of the month
ESD assess deliverables and approved funding based on reporting here in the forum. Monthly reporting template here. We have requested
It would not seem reasonable though to expect the Finance team to trawl the forum for this information so a simple process whereby the teams report funding directly to Finance would be good.
These are very good processes that help set realistic contributor reward payments. Thank you
Edit to Aragon Govern
Not quite sure what this is saying but from what I can gather, I agree one multi-sig will significantly improve the three step process. However, ESD funding from Main DAO was approved on the basis that
In order to change a process formally established via on-chain voting we would need to vote on a Main DAO proposal. The ESD can not approve a change to an on-chain Main DAO agreement. Would the Finance team expect to make this proposal S1? You will have my vote in favour and the development of standards to support clarification around the Charter attracts fixed $500 additional funding
Can you clarify please why Anukriti is listed as an unpaid contributor to this proposal? Or can you clarify please how ops involvement with this guild is delineated from work within the DAOOps Guild. Maybe an idea of time and contribution to the financial objectives and deliverables.
Edits are required to this proposal. Rather than determining here all needed processes perhaps list this as a deliverable. I look forward to working closely with this team, excited to see monthly financial reports and more transparency around the value flow within the AN DAO.
Although this proposal was not posted with seven days lead time it is a listed priority and we will look to provide either a decision on funding or request further clarification following the ESD General Meeting scheduled for Monday 18 April UTC 1900