ESD Funding Request: [Aragon Court: Awake the Sleeping Giant]

My understanding was that proposal is not being funded because of somewhat limited scope clarity, not because of “an alternative that might come”. I am okay to keep the decision as it stands, the provided reasoning seems strange.

“Another team might submit a better proposal” is grounds for dismissal of every proposal. We should be more transparent around proposal or team deficiencies that drive our decisions

Agreed I trust that given the feedback the reasons for our respective decisions are now clear. For the record, I will add “limited scope clarity” to the ESD decision above