Does competition really matter? I think Aragon can be better described as public good than for-profit enterprise (and I really hope it will not devolve into it).
I’m not aware what a “community grant” is, does this mean ANT token holders voted on an amount to allocate for this work or is it similar to the Nest grant program where a group of core Aragon folks approved your research ?
This is our first priority with doing consultations, we think there are many benefits between all the DAO frameworks and don’t view thing’s as “competition” even though most our membership are Moloch developers. Since RaidGuild is a development DAO firstly it’s in our interest to bring the clients the best solution for their use-case.
IMO this approach might not serve the most use-cases of DAO adoption. Competition between framework is very Apple VS Microsoft and won’t really serve the users in the end. It might even negativily effect the state of adoption. So I’m interested in seeing if this perspective might be shifted towards one more of cooperation and shared resources
I believe that our membership are naturally aligned with a cooperative frame of mind, we are DAO neutral, ETH loyalists lol. Being that we have members from all DAO’s it’s more of a cultural learning experience for all of us, as well as a way to connect with other talented devs who like to jam on Web3 projects.
Come and join us, let’s work together on adoption
I think an interesting approach would be a work token on a bonding curve backed by ANT.
Basically a group of consultants can pool their time, and then convert that time into a token that represents it. Since ANT is a store of value asset correlated to the DAO economy (because it provides services to DAOs) using ANT as collateral for such bonding curve could make sense.
As there’s more and more demand for the consultants, their token price would go up. If they help build meaningful DAOs, then ANT would go up too, making the consultants’ token further appreciate.
Aragon token holders financially supported Aragon to build out Aragon Network’s ecosystem. They didn’t contribute towards DAOstack, Colony, etc. for building out their ecosystems and supporting the value of their tokens.
This doesn’t take away from the public good concept at all. Aragon’s tools are open source and available to all.
If Aragon/Aragon team members are going to be plugging other DAO platforms, then I suppose it’s OK as long as the community is OK with it, there is full disclosure, and value accrues directly to Aragon and its tokens regardless of which DAO platform ends up getting the client.
@luis I love this idea! I am still studying about bonding curves!
I’m going to think about this a little further, see if I can add anything. My wifi is super slow right now.
@Yalor Please know that I’m not dissing your idea at all. I intuitively thought from the beginning that as a consultant, you should be prepared to offer your client the best solution, regardless of the platform. This is especially true if it is going to be a longer-term client engagement.
My comments are influenced by my background and having witnessed some colleagues be terminated from very senior positions at companies because of non-disclosures of situations involving potential self-dealing and conflicts of interest. These issues are taken very seriously in the traditional world.
I realize in the world of DAOs, people can just be anonymous and operate under an avatar, so maybe we will have to come up with some new standards as we go along. But there still needs to be a baseline or some type of algorithm where value is accruing to the organizations, token holders, and other stakeholders where interests are properly aligned and there are no hidden conflicts.
So probably you would like to participate in this event
Very interesting! Although I have been tracking Aragon from the beginning, I am only just starting to make progress myself (too many balls in the air as usual . . ) but I will have a closer look at RG.
My thinking is something like an honour system with tokens:
- Someone / a consultant does phone / video support for someone else at a particular rate - proportional to experience / expertise - say 1, 2 or 3 newly minted tokens per minute
- The supported person receives these tokens, being “Paid Forward” by the consultant ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pay_It_Forward_(film) )
- The receiver of the support and the paid-forward tokens then has an honour-obligation to pay the value forward to someone else in support and passing on some or all of the tokens - reducing their own “debt”
I don’t know if this makes sense but I can elaborate more on it if you like . .
No offense taken, we at RaidGuild are only interested in spreading adoption of DAO’S and finding the best solutions for clients. We are not paid or supported by any large token bank, our members actually pay to join the DAO so there would essentially be no benefit to trying to force a certain toolset on a client.
I would encourage you to pursue a membership with us https://raidguild.org/join where you might have a better shot at understanding DAO’s in the wild and start to think about them as interoperable parts of a larger system (Ethereum) would be glad to see someone with a solid business acumen jam on this DAO consultation idea with our team.
This is quote an interesting idea, we could definitely use something like this since we’re constantly taking spec calls with clients and only a % of them follow through.
Might act as a filter for “serious” clients to schedule consultations. How do you see the token distribution mechanics being setup ? Something like Sablier ?
I think it sounds great for Aragon specific consultants, but not so much towards a diversity of DAO’s. The idea of having the token value tied to ANT or ETH for that matter is not exactly reassuring guessing something like this would need to be subsidized by ANT holders to get started.
We’ve been exploring the idea of pooling the personal tokens of each member in a group into a bond that would then reflect the value of each Individual in the group. Kind of like a token set.
What would be REALLY cool is if buying non voting shares actually bought and minted new ptokens from all of the member’s curves and wrapped them in a single token, kind of like iearn.finance, where one could deposit a single asset (say DAI) and receive a pool token that represents a split of all the ptokens that the receiver could maintain their portfolio through.
This would stabilize the value of the token that represents the groups time, and it would encourage the group to only draft the highest value contributers.
@burrrata Hi! I sent you a message on KeyBase.
Wow…will check it out!
Update…just registered! Are you attending on June 4?
Exactly - accepting PIF (Pay It Forward) tokens implies accepting an obligation for the future to repay the support the person has received to the next generation of adopters. I will have a look at Sablier.
Actually, I was just thinking that there is no reason why this PIF token needs to be restricted to a particular DAO or even any particular type of support - I have Open Source support debts to repay since the 70s and although I have done what I can to support OS in return, a formalised token arrangement might be a good social mechanism to have.
Something like this would also be a good entry mechanism for newbies getting started with ETH and Crypto in general - setting up the account etc implies a certain amount of commitment - although there would be no legal enforcement and it would remain an honour- based system, there is is still the psychological impact of the commitment and the public record of the tokens . .
Yeah, I was certainly seeing it for Aragon specific consultants!
The token set sounds dope. You can create a DAO that pools those tokens, and use Redemptions to allow people to exchange the DAO’s token for a proportional share of the underlying personal tokens. Hit me up if you are planning to build that!
yes, I will, its cool to practice bonding curves for 24h see you there
16 Dreams of DAO tradable NFT tickets left for testnet DAO creation: https://rinkeby.mintbase.io/pez-dispenser/0x72226d2c748999aa93850a82af5249fec8fcb460/9tbKwsh11ueSM7vYw4KGg6UilMwTa1oRuhmfiTeWLlU
Every person who learns how to set up a DAO at no cost potentially becomes a paid consultant.
Goal: To speed up Aragon DAO adoption by providing incentives to become skilled at setting up and running DAOs, and by cultivating a large pool of skilled DAO consultants, provide readily available talent and best practices needed to stimulate interest in and fulfill demand for DAOs, and enable them to flourish for the long term.
You can read more about the Dreams of DAO initiative here: Funding Proposal: Test the Viability of DAO Consultants
Overly complex structures and processes tend to always suffer from inordinate delay and stagnation. When things become complicated with a steep learning curve, they cease to become timely, spontaneous, and efficient. The more steps, the more can go wrong. A very involved process also ends up killing creativity, enthusiasm, and motivation.
So I want to help people learn by playing, to become engaged in immersive learning and rapid prototyping of as many Aragon DAOs as possible, to test as many different structures and business models as the mind can conceive, in the shortest time, and while utilizing the least amount of resources.