When validating myself with the keybase CLI I ran:
ākeybase pgp sign --clearsign -mā
before the text in speechmarks "Iām @julian_brooks on Keybaseā¦ " etc.
Also requires 3 backticks on a line before the text (above) and three more at the end (below).
THe output should then look more like the above correctly formatted examples.
Iām so lost with this membership thing tbh. Is it me or everybody is linking a PGP address to their social profiles instead of an Ethereum address as per the initial instructions?
Also this is meant to ensure 1 person 1 vote right? So I and any fellow fridge AI and other IOT AIs like myself cannot participate right? Joke aside, do you accept pseudo-anonymous contributors like myself? I suppose not since that would open you up to Sybil attacks. But the way you are currently doing this, I think I could participate as well as create a few other personas to increase my voting power within the Coop.
It seems to me that if you want 1p1v, the verification should be done through the Aragon association by checking actual ids. Itās old school but if youāre looking for trusted 1p1v, it might be a better way.
I guess what Iām saying is that if I create three personas (or more) and participate a bit with all three for a while to let you believe itās three different persons, and you let each verify on the coop, then your 1p1v strategy is broken as I would get 1p3v (or more).
All I want is to be wrong. Roast me.
edit: ok I missed the part where the Ethereum address is provided at a later stage for privacy reason, apologies for missing this bit. Iām still curious about the Sybil protection however.
This is definitely a concern, and one of the reasons to start experimenting nowā¦
The actual process for getting a membership token in the actual organization (as opposed to just validating a social account), could certainly be more strict. Itās definitely still TBD how the cooperative wants to self-organize and define and validate what ābeing an active member of the community entailsā.
I donāt think anything in the process as it stands would preclude pseudonymous participation, and if you do maintain multiple identities that pass whatever test the cooperative comes up with determine āactiveā participation you would indeed be able to get more influence than just 1p1v ā but so long as you cannot do this with bots, its not clear if someone being able to maintain a handful of additional identities is really problematic (and this probably depends ultimately on what ends up being the goal of the cooperative).
wellcome to the Community! Iām glad to see new people here, we currently reviewing our membership onboarding process and expect to have a new one very soon (best case scenario: next week), so Iām afraid you would have to wait a little bit before receiving a membership Token.
In the meanwhile, I encourage you to tell us a bit about who you are, why you would like to join the AragonCoop and what do you have to offer to the community!
Sure, just recently joined through the Flock program as Aragon Black currently hacking on Apiary / pando. Iāve primarily been focused on metadata registries for smart contracts to improve the verification process of on-chain data. Iām interested in joining the coop since Iām not an ANT holder and feel like I could add value to some of the initiatives inside of the technical committee (specifically surrounding radspec)
Sounds dope. @gh1dra, please confirm yr keybase and weāll get you on the coop keybase group. Hope youāll be up for joining discussions and yes please, re participating into initiatives.
I need to dive into radspec some more - maybe we could think of a tutorial, or covering something that isnāt well documented yet (or something:). Seems fascinating piece of code.
and feel like I could add value to some of the initiatives inside of the technical committee (specifically surrounding radspec)
